There's still a difference between being crazy and being inflammatory.
"Stick to what you know"? Are you saying this comic isn't inflammatory? Because that's my point.
I still don't think this is proof Ted Rall wouldn't be attacked, it's your opinion. I don't think he would harass people on the streets with the ideas he presents in the comic, because he would fear for getting punched in the face. Yes, that's my opinion. Saying "stick to what you know" is moronic unless you KNOW he wouldn't get punched in the face.
In fact, if I knew Ted Rall was scheduled to be on a street corner in New York saying these things, I'd go punch him in the face. So you're wrong. He could get attacked. Because I would go do it.
Stick to what you know, Mikey. Stick to what you know.
I'm not quite sure what your point is, if you're point isn't "the comic is not inflammatory".
You EXPECT crazy people on the street corner to say crazy things. You don't EXPECT a news outlet to publish hateful, inflammatory speech.
---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008